问题：sjtu博士生抄袭被揭发！
类型：交流
提问：hellexplor
等级：▲▲
版块：灌水乐园(goldjohn,沧海一声笑,)
信誉：75%
回复：11
阅读：660
时间：2005-05-18 21:38:14 编辑加入/取消收藏订制/取消短消息举报该贴

被揭发的作者是Y. Song and G. Hu

来源
＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝

ELECTRONICS LETTERS 14th April 2005 Vol. 41 No. 8

A note on plagiarism

Electronics Letters prides itself on its rigorous peer review process that
is essential to ensure

the high standard of the short research papers that are published. A huge
number of researchers

across the spectrum of electronic science and engineering give up their
valuable time to provide

expert opinions on the quality and originality of the Letters that are
submitted. However, this

process is not totally infallible, and on very rare occasions, a paper may
slip through to be

published that is not entirely original or does not give due recognition to
previous work. In the

most serious of these cases, a plagiarism occurs.

Whether deliberate or accidental, plagiarism is extremely serious and these
cases need to be

publicised as they have an impact on the integrity of the journal.
Unfortunately one such case has

recently been brought to our attention by H. Goldman, the author of the
original work, who has

written the following on the matter:

The following claim was made in a recent paper by Y. Song and G. Hu [1]: ‘In
this Letter, we

introduce the excision CFAR (E-CFAR) method . . . ’. The Excision CFAR
Detector has indeed been

introduced in an IEE publication, but it was not in [1]. The original
papers on the Excision

Detector were published in the IEE Proceedings in 1988 [2] and 1990 [3].

The paper by Song and Hu [1] is an unfortunate example of plagiarism.
Considerable portions of [1]

were copied verbatim, sentence-by-sentence and equation-by-equation, from
the two original papers

which were not included in the list of references. Of the ten equations in
[1], eight equations were

reproduced from [2] and [3]. Consequently, if the plagiarised material in
[1] is extracted, very

little remains.

References
1 Song, Y., and Hu, G.: ‘Adaptive acquisition of PN code using excision
CFAR detector in
multipath fading mobile channels’, Electronics Letters, 40, (5), 4 March
2004, pp. 338–339
2 Goldman, H., and Bar-David, I.: ‘Analysis and applications of the
excision CFAR detector’, IEE
Proceedings, Part F, December 1988, pp. 563–575
3 Goldman, H.: ‘Performance of the excision CFAR detector in the presence
of interferers’,
IEE Proceedings, Part F, June 1990, pp. 163–171

The Editors of Electronics Letters would like to apologise to H. Goldman
for this serious incident,
although thankfully it is a rare occurrence in over forty years of the
publication.
--

中文版
自适应判决门限PN码混合捕获方案
宋　阳,　胡光锐,　刘　烨
上海交通大学电子工程系,上海200030)

宋阳(1978一)，男，江苏徐州市人，博士生，主要研究方向为扩频通信同步技术、通信抗干扰．

回复人：chemsong,▲▲▲ () 时间：2005-05-18 22:11:56 编辑	1楼
无语..........

回复人：寒冰,▲ (从分子生物、生态，转行到应用化学。。。) 时间：2005-05-19 18:51:47 编辑	2楼
！！！！中国的学术界。。。。。。

回复人：sunyubo,★★ (雾雨电 qq:79196142) 时间：2005-05-19 18:53:47 编辑	3楼
hai

回复人：asjxcn,▲▲▲ () 时间：2005-05-19 23:03:14 编辑	4楼
以前华化出了个胡黎明让陈敏恒倒了霉。现在却比比皆是。不知该生导师是谁？

回复人：tina,▲ (新手上路) 时间：2005-05-20 00:54:37 编辑	5楼
所以我基本不看国内的学者的著作，呵呵

回复人：zhijian888,▲ (请多多指教) 时间：2005-05-20 14:01:08 编辑	6楼
asjxcn，您知道吗？胡黎明其实是一个年轻有为的老师，并非外界所说的学术造假，论文中的内容是他同日本朋友的共同成果，他和陈敏恒倒下更多的是学术界权利斗争的牺牲品！

回复人：asjxcn,▲▲▲ () 时间：2005-05-20 15:26:24 编辑	7楼
同意楼上说法。当年胡确实可认为是颗学术明星（全国最年轻的博导），也是陈先生最得意的门生。那时以学术造假为由即可掀翻导师，比较之下现在是不是很麻木了？

回复人：游壳,▲ (好好学有机，好好用有机) 时间：2005-05-25 14:10:20 编辑	8楼
寒。。。

回复人：chemist431,▲ () 时间：2005-05-25 15:41:48 编辑	9楼
对，同意7楼

回复人：hzqbamboo,▲ (化学操作工) 时间：2005-05-26 16:36:56 编辑	10楼
我是基本上不看国内的论文的!

回复人：jizheng,▲▲▲ (严谨、勤奋、大胆) 时间：2005-09-28 09:42:01 编辑	11楼
抄就抄吧，人家也肯定有人家的难处。只要内容正确不误人子弟就行了。我从来不关心真理的发现者叫什么名字。

问题讨论没有结束...

您尚未进入本论坛,登录之后才可以回贴

7msec